الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract tonic-clonic seizures including all aspects of this Common Many studies had been done on patients with generalized upon the immunogenetic aspects. convulsive disorder, but little of these studies stressed The aim of this work is to study the changes in humoral and their siblings. Also to throw light on the genetic marker (HLA) in patients and cellular immunity in these patients and their siblings. The study was carried out on three g<roups: 1. Patients group: 30 patients divided into two sUbgroups and Subgroup II with +ve family history of generalized each of 15 patients. SUbgroup I with •--ve family history tonic-clonic seizures. The patients and their siblings Department of EI-Mansoura General HoSpital. were selected from outpatient clinic of Neuro-psychiatric 2. Relatives group: 60 siblings divided into two sUbgroups each of 30 siblings. SUbgroup I related to patients with -ve family history and sUbgroup II related to patients with +ve family history of generalized tonic-clonic seizures. ---------- ----------------- 207 3. Control group: 15 healthy non epilepti•c persons only for immunity study. ing studies: All patients and siblings were SUbjected to the follo w _ 3. ImmUnological study: 2. E.E.G study (for verification of diagnosis). 1. History, physical and neurological e~:amination. A. Humoral Immunity Study: IgA, IgG, 19M by single radial immunodiffUsion. B. Cellular Immunity Study: b) Lymphocyte transformation test. a) Erythrocyte rosette formation test. 4. HLA-antigens determination for the following loci: Locus- A: 1,2,3,9,lO,ll,IH9,28 and 29. Locus B: 5,7,8,12,13,14,15,17,18,27,37 and 40. Locus DR: 1,2,3,4,5 and 7. tically by Using the IBM personal computer and the micro The results of the investigations were evaluated statis_ stat statistical programe. from the stUdy and without going again into much tedious statistical details but stressing only on the significant --------------------------------- --------_._-_._------- ----- -- 208 data the following, results were obtained: * Statistically significant decrease in the serum level of IgA in group of patients (23.33%) and their sUbgroup I (20%) and II (26.66%). No significant changes as regards IgM and IgG were obtained. * No sig~ificant change as regards IgA, IgM, IgG in relatives group were found. * Significant decrease in E-rosette percentage in total patients group (36.6%) and their sUbgroup I (33.3%) and II (40%) . * No significant change in E-rosette percentage in SUbgroup I of siblings and significant decrease in 10% of subgroup II. * No statistically significant changes were obtained either in patients or their siblings when compared with control group as regards lymphocyte transformatJ.on test. ned: As regards HLA study the following resUlts were obtai- In patients group: • * Statistically significant increase in HLA-A9 frequency (S3.3%)when compared to 380 normal Egyptian controls which_ was 8.9% (X~ = 47.092, P < 0.05), with high relative risk 11.68 and gene frequency 0.317. * Significant low frequency of HLA-A2 (10%) when compared with normal Egyptian population which was 29.5% (X’ = c frequency 0.051. 6.534, P < 0.05) with low relative risk 0.265 and gene * Significant increase in HLA-DR5 frequency (23.3%) when compared to normal Egyptian population (6.1%) (X~ = 7.748, P < 0.05) with high relative risk 4.676 and gene frequency • 0.134. In siblings group: The only positive finding was significant decrease in the frequency of HLA-Al (6.7%) cOlllparewjith normal Egyptian population which was 20% (Xc’ = 7.121, P <: 0.05) with low relative risk 0.287 and gene frequency 0.034. ing interesting data were revealed: In addition to the above mentioned resut ts, the fOllow_ * Significant association between increasE!d frequency of HLA-A9 , decreased frequency of HLA-A2 and low level of IgA in the serum of patients group. -------------------------------- ------------ ------- - 210 * Significant association between incr,eased frequency of HLA-A9. decreased frequency of HLA-A:2, increased frequency of HLA-DRS and low E-rosette percentage of patients group • |