الفهرس 
التحضيضيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 266 |  |  |
| | | from | 266 | | |
المستخلص
Thus: after this study of the ways of demands in the Holy Qur’an.
I have concluded the following results :
Concerning Structure :
The study offered a formative and comprehensive research for
the methods of request and ended by showing the simple aids of these
methods from the complicated ones .
The means of urgement and smooth request was various in
structure.
Moreover : I studied each aid separately to know what is simple
from what is compound.
I discussed the ancient opinions and concluded that the aids can
emerge from the beginning .
In the means of requesting urgently and smoothly I concluded
that the aids of each are compound not simple except (IF}) .
In the meantime, some scholars see that some of them are
compound, others are not, I agreed with those who see them compound
IN wishing I concluded that the means is simple with no
difference . I dealt with the positions of the sentence of wishing, then
the response .
In request, I concluded that its aids are accuping the chest of the
sentence, then I dealt with (...--”) between the verb and the preposition .
I discussed the scientists opinions and observed confusion and
misuse and concluded that it is a verb .
I dealt with (J----J) as a structure or not, I concluded that it is
simple and agreed with Al-Siotty, then I dealt with the position of the
sentence of request and wishing in speech. I dealt with the response
and found no difference in it . In praying (Doa’a) I observed that it has
rules which are the same as ordering and prohibiting .
I dealt with the positions of the sentence and the response. In
interrogation, I dealt with the question of the concluded that its aids may
part from the introduction itself, I dealt with origin of the aids and tried
to know the origin and the branch, Some ancient scholars concluded the
origin of (Hamza) through they did not reach the reason causing it .
I discussed the opinions in the origin of aids .
Then, I went on to the matter of (Or ri)between interrogation and
interjection .
I discussed the opinions of Grammarians in this respect . I
concluded that (Or ri) is a preposition which cannot equal to Hamza of
interrogation as a means of requesting a agreeting and beginning or in
its comprehensiveness .
Then, I moved to (Hall) and the originity of interrogating it, I
discussed opinions and observed in accuracy and excluded their
explanation of it as on equivalent of (Kadd) .
I concluded that it is a question word . I dealt with the origin of
(Mann) . I disagreed that its origin is (Ma L...) . I concluded that (Aian)
is simple and so is (Kamm) .
I dealt with the position of question word in a sentence .
In command I discussed the matter of its occupying . The chest of
the sentence and concluded that it is not cut from the present. I dealt
with the nouns of verbs and the matter of simple and compound as well
as the positions of the command sentence in the Holy Qur’an and the
response of command . In calling I dealt with its aids and saw some of
them used for the near and others for the far, I said that determining this
from that is due to the common traditions . I discussed the matter of the
preposition of calling and its relation to the non-nouns. In prohibition, I
introduced a formative study for the aids of prohibition and discussed
the opinions of Grammarians about its origin .
I disagreed with them . I discussed its occupation of the chest of
the sentence and said so .
This concerns with structural aspect . As for the meaning aspect .
I depended no two dimensions to reach the meaning of deep structure .
The study of the word and its relation with its neighbors .
I concluded some various measurements for the means apart from
its real meaning according to its conditions .