الفهرس 
ResultsOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 105 |  |  |
| | | from | 105 | | |
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study is to compare and evaluate implant osseointegration
with two different surface treatments: hydroxyapatite with calcium phosphate
and sandblasted rough acid etched surface.
Patients and Methods: This prospective clinical study included the placement of
sixteen dental implants with split-mouth technique in eight patients who missing
two lower posterior teeth bilaterally, divided into (group I) side with
hydroxyapatite with calcium phosphate surface and (group II) the other side
with a sandblasted rough acid etched surface. Radiographic images were
obtained in both pre-operative and follow-up phase. Then image analysis after
at 1,3, 5months post-operatively was performed using IDRISI Kilimanjar, and
then Data was collected, tabulated, and statistically analyzed using an IBM
compatible personal computer with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
(SPSS) version 26.
Results: The statistical analysis for bone density values around implant showed
a significant difference between groups using independent T-test at P
value<0.05 under different time intervals, where sandblasted acid etch
(Switzerland) implant (group I) gave the highest change within first 5 month
after implantation than hydroxyapatite calcium phosphate (turkey) coated
surface implant (group II). The rate of bone density improvement by time in
both groups has significant difference, but neither age nor gender has significant
difference in the obtained results.