الفهرس 
IntroductionOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 123 |  |  |
| | | from | 123 | | |
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency or not of the MPM compared to the xenograft bone grafting in maxillary sinus lift. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted randomly on patients selected for treatment with a total of sixteen lateral window sinus lift with simultaneous implants placement. Their ages were range between 20-60 years old. Participating patients were split into two groups equally and randomly; control group: eight Sinus floor elevation was performed with simultaneous implant placement. As a grafting material, Xenograft was used. Study group: eight Sinus floor elevation was achieved with simultaneous implant placement. Xenograft has been used in the form of MPM as a grafting material. Using CBCT before and after sinus augmentation after implant loading to measure bone volume and height after 1 week of baseline (T0), after 6 months (T1), and after 12 months of baseline (T0) (T2). The Osstell (PT) was used for the assessment of implant stability at implant insertion (PT0) as well as for loading visit (PT1).