Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Diode cluster laser versus complete decongestive therapy in postmastectomy lymphedema /
الناشر
Christina Sabry Ayoub ,
المؤلف
Christina Sabry Ayoub
هيئة الاعداد
مناقش / Christina Sabry Ayoub
مشرف / Maher Ahmed El Keblawy
مشرف / Soheir Shehata Rezkallah
مشرف / Samy Ramzy Shehata
تاريخ النشر
2017
عدد الصفحات
139 P. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
العلاج الطبيعي والرياضة والعلاج وإعادة التأهيل
تاريخ الإجازة
17/9/2016
مكان الإجازة
جامعة القاهرة - علاج طبيعي - Basic Science
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 170

from 170

Abstract

Background: Secondary upper limb lymphedema is a chronic disease that affects patient’s quality of life or even a life threatening case. Propose of the study: to investigate the effectiveness of diode cluster laser (DCL) versus complete decongestive therapy (CDT) in the treatment of secondary post mastectomy lymphedema. Methods: 45 female patients with upper limb lymphedema (stage II, according to Foldi classification) were included in current study, their age ranged from 40 to 60 years. They were divided randamly into 3 groups 15 patients for each group. Procedures: Study group A (n=15) received DCL with conventional traditional program of physical therapy including; cryotherapy, manual massage, and range of motion exercise. Study group B (n=15) received CDT including manual lymph drainage, short stretch bandage, free active exercises and skin care program with the conventional traditional program. Control group C (n=15) received the conventional traditional program only. Treatment program was given with the frequency of 3 sessions per week for 2 months. The measurements of the upper limb were done by round measurements with tape at three points; wrist joint, elbow joint and at the end of the arm just below the axillary fold and water displacement by the volumetry were taken before, at the mid (after a month) and at the end of treatment (2 months). Results: Comparison between groups A and B revealed a significant difference of tape measurement at wrist (P=0.014), a significant difference between groups B and C (P=0.001), and no significant difference between A and C P=0.154