Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of lateral and posterior invasion in patients with placenta accreta spectrum disorders /
الناشر
Rana Ahmed Mohamed Elbarmelgy ,
المؤلف
Rana Ahmed Mohamed Elbarmelgy
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Rana Ahmed Mohamed Elbarmelgy
مشرف / AbdAlla Yehia Elkateb
مشرف / Ahmed Mahmoud Hussein
مشرف / Mohamed Faisal Ebrahim
تاريخ النشر
2021
عدد الصفحات
91 P . :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
أمراض النساء والتوليد
تاريخ الإجازة
16/6/2021
مكان الإجازة
جامعة القاهرة - كلية الطب - التوليد وامراض النساء
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 110

from 110

Abstract

Objectives: Standardized ultrasound imaging protocols have been developed for the prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders (PAS). The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate a cohort of patients at high-risk of PAS using ultrasound signs for the diagnosis of posterior and lateral accreta placentation and evaluate their effectiveness by comparing them with guided microscopic examination. Methods: A cohort of 90 consecutive patients diagnosed as PAS by prenatal ultrasound examination, who were candidates for either cesarean hysterectomy or conservative management, were investigated prospectively using the standardized description of ultrasound signs of PAS proposed by the European Working group on abnormally invasive placenta (EW-AIP), used -when relevant-to detect posterior and lateral PAS. In all cases, the ultrasound diagnosis of posterior or lateral adhesion/invasion was compared to results of histopathological examination. Guided histologic sampling was used to target abnormally adherent/invasive areas Results: All patients had a history of 1 or more prior cesarean deliveries (CDs) and presented with a low-lying/placenta previa. The overall performance of ultrasound in the antenatal detection of lateral accreta placentation in our cohort was as follows: sensitivity, 73.58 (95% CI, 59.67 to 84.74) %; specificity, 97.30 (95% CI, 85.84 to 99.93) %; positive likelihood ratio (LR+), 27.23 (95% CI, 3.91 to 189.47); negative likelihood ratio (LR{u2013}), 0.27 (95% CI, 0.17 to 0.43) and diagnostic accuracy, 83.33% (74.00 to 90.36%)