Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
الأسس اللغوية لاستنباط الأحكام الفقهية فى كتاب (بداية المجتهد ونهاية المقتصد لابن رشد) /
المؤلف
ياسين، مروه محمود حسين احمد.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / مروه محمود حسين احمد ياسين
مشرف / وائل السيد البرعي السعيد
مناقش / محمود محمود السيد الدريني
مناقش / خالد فهمي إبراهيم محمد
الموضوع
الأحكام الشرعية. القواعد الفقهية. الفقه الإسلامي - مذاهب.
تاريخ النشر
2022.
عدد الصفحات
مصدر الكترونى (1030 صفحة) :
اللغة
العربية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
قانون
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2022
مكان الإجازة
جامعة المنصورة - كلية الهندسة - قسم اللغة العربية
الفهرس
يوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام

from 551

from 551

المستخلص

Ibn Rushd (grandson), Mohammed bin Ahmed bin Mohammed bin Rushd, Abu al-Walid, Faqih of the people of Andalusia, was born in Cordoba in 520 AH, before the death of the grandfather the Judge Abu Walid Ibn Rushd by a month, and grew up in Cordoba, studied Fiqh assets, grammar and Sunnah. He mastered medicine, mastered Arabic, literature, and philosophy, and was appointed judge of Cordoba, and his death was in Marrakesh 595 AH. The limits of the study: Time limit: Ibn Rushd lived in the era of the Al-Mowahedeen state; He was born in 520 AH, and he died in 595 AH, and this era was called the Islamic Golden Age. Spatial limit: Ibn Rushd was born in Cordoba in Andalusia, which was still in its golden age, and took over the judiciary in Seville, and died in Marrakesh. Objective limit: This study deals with the linguistic bases for deducing jurisprudential rulings in the book (The beginning of the Mujtahid and the end of the Muqtased), written by the judge and the Imam Abu Al-Walid Muhammad bin Ahmed bin Muhammad bin Rushd Al-Hafeed (520 - 595 AH), investigated and graduated by Muhammad Subhi Hassan Hallaq, Ibn Taymiyyah Library, Cairo, distributed Al-Maarefa Library, Jeddah. Linguistic limit: This study deals with the presentation and analysis of jurisprudential issues and the elicitation of their jurisprudential rulings so the study in linguistics. The researcher did not confine her presentation to the era of Ibn Rushd only; Rather, I combined his opinion with the opinion of those who preceded him and those who followed him from among the scholars of different ages and countries. Among the objectives of the message: - Explaining the strong relationship between jurists and linguists; Determining the linguistic foundations on which Ibn Rushd relied in clarifying the reasons for the differences of scholars in their jurisprudence rulings. - Detailing aspects of linguistic foundations: the fundamentalist basis, morphological, syntactic, semantic, stylistic, and rhetorical grammar then an explanation of the role of these foundations in application in knowing the reasons for the difference between scholars. - The study shows that there are many issues in which scholars of jurisprudence and language differ so scientific research cannot neglect this disagreement nor bias to one category and mistake the other without examination, research, and scrutiny. Study Approach: To achieve the objectives of this study, the descriptive approach was the one used in it. This was represented in the following research methodology:- Determining a linguistic level for the study, which is the classical Arabic language represented in the book (The beginning of the Mujtahid and the end of the Muqtasid) by Ibn Rushd. - Define a language sample; To analyze it, and to clarify its characteristics, which are the issues that contain linguistic foundations in the book: (The beginning of the Mujtahid and the end of the Muqtasid). - Presentation of the linguistic foundations with a brief explanation of each basis. - Classifying issues that contain linguistic bases and distributing them under each of the linguistic bases. - Analyzing issues that contain a linguistic basis that affects the deduction of the jurisprudential ruling with the help of the opinions of the previous and subsequent scholars of Ibn Rushd.