الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Oral cavity reconstruction is one of the most challenging procedures in the field of head and neck reconstruction because of the complex anatomical structure and multiple functional aspects of the oral cavity. An ideal oral cavity reconstruction should closely resemble both the form and the function of the original resected structures. However, there is a lack of consensus for the selection of suitable reconstructive flaps after oral cancer resection.Therefore, the choice of the flap reconstruction is usually based on the surgeon preference rather than the scientific evidence because of the limited available evidence about the best reconstructive options to achieve optimal functional results.Over the last two decades, the RFFF has been the workhorse in oral cavity soft tissue reconstruction, while the SIPF has gained enormous popularity in oral cavity reconstruction with very low donor site morbidity and reduced health care costs.This study is a prospective study to compare the functional outcomes measures between SIPF and RFFF groups through subjective PRO and objective clinical and instrumental measures |