الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract he application of nanotechnology plays an important role in the field of food processing because of its positive role on functional and technological characteristics of the products. So, this study aimed to produce soy protein isolate and glycinin nanoparticles using High Intensity Ultrasonic, characterization of the obtained nanoparticles by (TEM, FTIR, Zeta potential, XRD and particle size distribution), determination of functional properties (water holding capacity, oil holding capacity, emulsifiying properties and protein solubility) for the obtained proteins. The obtained soy protein particles were used for production of food products such as beef burger, mayonnaise and apple chips and studying the functional characteristics of these products during the storage period. The obtained results of this study are summarized in the following points Part I: Extraction of soy protien and glycinin Soy protein isolates (SPI) and glycinin (GLY) protein was extracted by aqueous solutions of adjusted pH-values. Results obtained for the chemical composition of protein isolate showed that the protein content in the soybean protein isolate was 90.4 % while in glycinin 91.3 %. There was also a significant difference between all the other parameters, moisture content, Fat and Ash content of the obtained fractions. Part II: Preparation and characterization of nanoparticles Application of high intensity ultrasonic (400 W for 50 min) reduced particle size of soybean protein isolate from 123.9 nanometers to about 63.09 nanometers. The use of ultrasonication with the glycinin 128 SUMMARY Dina, E. H. Azab (2019), Ph.D., Fac. Agric., Ain Shams Univ. protein led to the synthesis of aggregated glycinin protein molecules from the size of 85 nanometers to a glycinin protein of 223 nanometers. FTIR for soybean protein and nano soybean protein showed an increase in the intensity of active groups at wavelengths (1000-2000cm-1), which is the finger print area of protein. This indicates that cracking large molecules into nanometer particles has increased the effective groups on the surface of molecules. As a result of increased surface area of the part for nano glycinin from glycinin, the intensity of active groups increased slightly due to the aggregation of molecules. The results of particle size distribution showed a poly dispersion index of soybean protein isolate, nano soy protein, glycinin and nano glycinin of 0.462, 0.414, 0.79 and 0.567, respectively. The conversion of protein molecules from their natural size to the nanometer size had an effect on the protein’s hydrophobicity, which increased in the soybean protein from 75.2 to 87.9 degrees. In glycinin, the results for hydrophobicity increased from 18.5 to 72.3°. Zeta potential showed a difference in the charge on soybean protein molecules after treatment with ultrasonication, Zeta potential values of soy protein was (-27.3), while it was increased to (-34.3) for nano soybean protein. In the case of glycinin there was a slight increase in the charge, where it was - 25.1 for glycinin and -25.5 in the protein glycinin nanometer. There were significant differences in both WHC and OHC for nano soy protein and nano glycinin compared with soybean protein and glycinin. The water holding capacity of the tested proteins were 2.70, 5.79, 2.28 and 4.03 (g/g), respectively for SPI, NSPI, GLY and NGLY. There were significant differences in the solubility between the soybean protein isolate and the soybean protein in nanoscale .This is due to improved protein solubility due to the decrease in the size of the protein molecules and the increase in the surface area, as well as in the 129 SUMMARY Dina, E. H. Azab (2019), Ph.D., Fac. Agric., Ain Shams Univ. solubility between glycinin and nano glycinin protein at different pH degrees (7, 9 and 11). X-ray diffraction showed a slight deviation at the top of the curve and a decrease of 2θ from 20.87 to 19.81 to the left, which in turn indicated a decrease in the crystallization of the nano soy protein from the soybean protein isolate. In the nano glycinin protein, there was right shift in curve and increase of 2θ from 19.75 to 19.93. This indicates an increase in the degree of crystallization. Part III: Application of nano proteins in some foods Production of burger Effect of freezing storage on moisture content of burger samples There was a decrease in moisture content of the negative control sample. The moisture losses percentage in frozen burger samples were 2.64%, 1.89%, 1.07 %, 1.46 % and 0.92% for negative control and those samples supplemented with SPI, NSPI, GLY and NGLY, respectively. Effect of freezing storage on protein content of burger samples The protein content of burger samples decreased as the time of frozen storage increased. The percentage loss was the lowest for NGLY samples (1.16%) and the highest loss was for the negative control (6. 5%). This indicated that nano soy protein particles improved the binding effect of water molecules, as well as their protecting effect on protein during freezing storage. Quality characteristics and cooking measurements of burger pH measurement of burger samples There was a decrease in pH at the end of frozen storage. The negative control decreased slightly from (5.9 to 5.8), SPI (6.5 to 6.4) and GLY (6.6 to 6.5). There were no changes in pH for NSPI and NGLY burgers. These results may be due to the ability of nano soy protein to bind water. The decrease in pH during frozen storage may be led to the 130 SUMMARY Dina, E. H. Azab (2019), Ph.D., Fac. Agric., Ain Shams Univ. breakdown of glycogen and accumulation of lactic acid during frozen storage. Shrinkage percent of cooked burger samples The lowest shrinkage percent at zero time was for NSPI and NGLY burgers (16.82 and 17.53), respectively. In addition, the shrinkage percent was increased during frozen storage for all burger samples. However the increase in the shrinkage percent was lowest in NSPI and NGLY burger samples. Cooking loss and cooking yield of cooked burger There was a significant difference (at p ≤ 0.05) in the percent of cooking yield and cooking loss of burger samples among the treatments. The addition of soy proteins either in the form of raw or nano proteins led to an increase in moisture retention. During the storage period, there was an increase in the percentage of cooking loss as a result of the freezing, which lead to the formation of ice crystals in the burger and also reduces the ability to retain water and therefore low cooking characteristics of the burger. Color measurement of beef burger There was a remarkable change in L*-value for all burger samples after the end of frozen storage (3 months) compared with L* value at zero time. L*-value for the negative control and NSPI burgers were increased from 47.4 to 48.6 and 45.08 to 48.47, respectively. L*-value for the SPI, GLY and NGLY burgers were decreased from 46.97 to 44.96, 46.45 to 43.44 and 46.02 to 43.88 , respectively. Texture profile analysis (TPA) for burger samples Nano soy protein isolate and nano glycinin have enhanced the texture parameters of fresh burger samples and keeping the texture quality parameters of the frozen burger samples during frozen storage. Sensory evaluation for beef burger 131 SUMMARY Dina, E. H. Azab (2019), Ph.D., Fac. Agric., Ain Shams Univ. The results of the sensory evaluation showed significant differences between the samples of the burger. The samples of the processed burger using soy protein isolate and nano glycinin recorded higher scores than the other burger samples and control. Production of mayonnaise Microscopic pictures of mayonnaise samples The large number of the particles surface of nano soy protein isolate and nano glycinin achieved by the nano processing of soy protein isolate and glycinin induces a stability effect between oil phase and the continuous phase of the produced mayonnaise samples. The results of the production of mayonnaise replaced with 0.5% - 1% - 1.5% of the soybean protein isolate, nano soy protein isolate, glycinin and nano glycinin as substitution of 50% egg yolk showed a significant decrease in the sensory acceptance score of the substitution ratio of 1% and 1.5% compared with commercial mayonnaise and control (100% egg yolks). pH- of mayonnaise sample During the storage period, a slight decrease in pH was observed with increase in the storage period compared with the control sample. Commercial mayonnaise had a very low pH compared with the other samples prepared using soybean proteins. Color parameters of mayonnaise samples Color parameters of mayonnaise samples prepared using different concentrations of soy protein were measured. The L*-values of mayonnaise supplemented with 0.5 % soy proteins and nano soy proteins were similar to the L* -values of the commercial control sample and laboratory control (100% egg yolks) except L*-value of mayonnaise samples supplemented with 1% and 1.5% soy protein isolate. This indicates that the increase in the percentage of protein had a negative |