الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract The role of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is often underestimated by anesthesiologists compared with other perioperative complications. It seems to be of minor importance. Rarely, it is lethal for the patient and almost never becomes chronic but it is an unpleasant experience for the patient. Physiology of nausea and vomiting key structures and pathways identified are: The chemoreceptor trigger zone located in the area postrema receiving inputs from blood-born drugs or hormones and stimulated by them. Vomiting center in the reticular formation, it coordinates the visceral and somatic components of the vomiting reflex. Risk factors of PONV ١) Patient-specific Female gender, non smoking, history of PONV, motion sickness, migrane, age, increases in children), obesity. ٢) Anesthesia-related independent predictors: unexperienced anesthetists Anesthetic agents like opioids, nitrous oxide, some intravenous agents like ketamine and volatile anesthetic agents, regional anesthesia. ٣) Surgery-related factors Type and duration of surgery. Management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Guideline ١: Identify Patients’ Risk for PONV Guideline ٢: Reduce Baseline Risk Factors for PONV Guideline ٣: Administer PONV Prophylaxis Using One to Two Interventions in Adults at Moderate Risk for PONV Guideline ٤: Administer Prophylactic Therapy with Combination (>٢) Interventions/Multimodal Therapy in Patients at High Risk for PONV. Guideline ٥: Administer Prophylactic Antiemetic Therapy to Children at Increased Risk for POV; as in Adults, Use of Combination Therapy Is Most Effective Guideline ٦: Provide Antiemetic Treatment to Patients with PONV Who Did Not Receive Prophylaxis or in Whom Prophylaxis Failed. The study included ١٢٠ patients. Their ages vary from ٢٠ to ٥٠ years old. ASA physical status I and II; with or without history of POV or motion sickness undergone (laparoscopic surgery. The patients are allocated randomly into six groups according to the antiemetic drug combination given. Each group consists of ٢٠ patients. group (DM): received ٨ mg dexamethasone and ٠٫١٥ mg/kg metoclopramide. group (MO): received ٠٫١ mg/kg ondansetron and ٠٫١٥ mg/kg metoclopramide. group (MG): received ٠٫١٥ mg/kg metoclopramide and ٠٫٠١ mg/kg IV granisetron. group (DO): received ٨ mg dexamethasone and ٠٫١ mg/kg ondansetron. group (DG): received ٨ mg dexamethasone and ٠٫٠١ mg/kg granisteron. group (P): received normal saline. Exclusion criteria included: ١- Patients with ASA > II. ٢- Cardiac disease. ٣- Neurological disease. ٤- Gastrointestinal disease. ٥- Mental retardation. ٦- Psychiatric illness. ٧- Severe renal or hepatic disease. ٨- Pregnancy, menstruating females, breast feeding, antiemetic or glucocorticoids, within ٢٤ hours of surgery. ٩- Obesity ١٠- Allergy of used drugs.١١- Patients with contraindications for non steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Assessment was done over ٢٤ hours after surgery as follows: - Onset, severity of nausea. - Frequency of attacks of vomiting. - Need for rescue drugs. - Incidence of side effects. - Duration of PACU and ward stay. Results obtained from the study suggested that the use of combination of dexamethasone and selective serotomin receptor antagonist was more effective than other combinations of either ٥-(HT٣) antagonists or dexamethasone with metoclopramide in increasing the frequency of achieving complete control of PONV including incidence, severity, need for rescue drugs and shorter stay in PACU and ward. Groups containing dexamethasone were more effective in controlling late PONV, groups containing ٥-(HT٣) antagonists were more effective in controlling early PONV. The most common side effect was severe headache and it was equal among all groups. |