Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Nonoperative Treatment Compared with Plate Fixation of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures in adults /
المؤلف
Hegazy, Ahmed Mohammed Yahya.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / احمد محمد يحيى حجازى
مشرف / احمد محسن العليمى
مشرف / محمد عبد المنعم قلقيلة
مشرف / محمد عبد الحميد رميح
الموضوع
Orthopedic.
تاريخ النشر
2018.
عدد الصفحات
p 123. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
جراحة العظام والطب الرياضي
تاريخ الإجازة
20/2/2019
مكان الإجازة
جامعة طنطا - كلية الطب - Orthopedic
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 152

from 152

Abstract

Summary
Clavicle fractures are common and the mid-shaft clavicular fracture is the commonest type. It accounts for approximately 1 in 20 (5%) of all fractures and 44% of all injuries to the shoulder girdle (1). Classification system was proposed by Robinson in 1998(4) who divided clavicular fractures into medial one fifth (Type I), middle three fifths (Type II), and lateral one fifth (Type III) fractures. The diagnosis of a clavicle fracture is relatively straightforward and it can be made readily from the patient’s history, physical examination and standard X-rays.
This study was meant to compare the outcomes of nonoperative treatment and operative treatment with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in adults to clarify the merits and possible disadvantages of each method.
Fourty adult patients were randomly grouped into two matched groups regarding age, sex and type of fracture in a prospective and retrospective clinical study. group A (20 patients) treated non-operatively and group B (20 patients) treated operatively.
In the present study; non-operative treatment showed superior results in comparison with operative treatment with no complications such as infection and hardware failure that require reoperation. 90% of