Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Comparative Study between
Antrolateral and Posterior Approach
in Dorsolumbar Fractures/
المؤلف
Ibrahim,Amr Galal
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / عمرو جلال ابراهيم
مشرف / عصام عبدالرحمن عماره
مشرف / حسين السيد محرم
مشرف / حازم احمد مصطفي
مشرف / هشام أنورعبد الرحيم
تاريخ النشر
2018
عدد الصفحات
227.p:
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
الطب
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2018
مكان الإجازة
جامعة عين شمس - كلية الطب - Neurosurgery
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 247

from 247

Abstract

Objective: the study aims to compare between Antrolateral and posterior approach in dorsolumbar fractures. Methods: the study was done retrospectively in the Neurosurgery Department on patient admitted in the period from October 2012 to November 2016 on 30 patients with sustained dorso-lumbar fractures. The study started after 30 patient was divided in two groups, first group undergo antrolatral approach, second group undergo posterior approach. Result: Thoracabdominal approach allows anterior decompression better than transpediular approach and Angular deformity is the more successfully corrected and maintained with the anterior approach. Conclusion: we have reached to conclusion from this study on both groups, that no difference between the two groups as regard to neurological state and fusion of fracture. But as regard to spinal canal diameter and kyphotic angel its seem that the anterior group more superior than the posterior group.