الفهرس 
الاستعراض المرجعي والدراسات السابقةيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 200 |  |  |
| | | from | 200 | | |
المستخلص
In view of the importance of agricultural extension in achieving agriculturaldevelopment in general and solving the problems of farmers in particular and trying to get farmers access to extension services, the agricultural sector in Libya has takensteps towards agricultural liberalization in recent years, where the farmer freely acts in choosing the type of agricultural activity that he wants to produce , And in dealingwith the various related parties that provide the production requirements in addition to the flexibility of choice in the mechanism of marketing products, as well as the implementation of the structural adjustment program in the agricultural sector led to many results, perhaps the most important bear burdens burdens and touch I. Mechanism and the provision of agricultural inputs, which are the seeds, seeds,fertilizers, pesticides and agricultural machinery in addition to the financing of agricultural operations costs.
Many of these countries have been criticized for the privatization strategy in the hope of reforming them and reducing the burden on the government budget. Thus, thereare several questions about the current situation in Libya and the extent to which the idea of privatizing extension services Governmentai organizations in Libya, thepossibility of privatizing them, the bases or requirements on which such privatizationshould be based, their constraints, their effects, and the vision of those interested in agricultural extension in Libya on these matters. The objective of the study is to determine the basis or requirements for theprivatization of agricultural extension in Libya in order to identify the agricultural extension and decision makers or the requirements that must be met when considering a strategy for privatization of agricultural extension by achieving thefollowing objectives:
1. Identifying the personal, professional, economic and supervisory characteristics of agricultural researchers and agricultural extension workers at all-levels of the Libyan extension organization and the leaders of local farmers in the three regions of Libya.
2. Identify the differences between the visions of the researchers and the executive officers working in the field of agricultural extension at all levels and leaders of the farmers in the quality of extension services and the possibility of privatization in Libya.
3. To identify the differences between the visions of the respondents in matters to be considered when applying the privatization of agricultural extension in Libya.
4. To identify the differences between the visions of the respondents in the bases or the following requirements should be based on the privatization of agricultural extension in Libya.
5. Identify the differences between the respondents’ visions in the pictures or the appropriate forms of the contribution of the farmers in the cost of extension services provided to them in Libya.
6. A proposal to outline the basis for the privatization of agricultural extension in Libya.
In addition to the preliminary data collected by questionnaire in the personainterview with 168 researchers in the field of agriculture and extension of agricultural colleges and research centers in the Ministry of Agriculture and 48 of the Responsible for agricultural extension at the level of the various management of agriculturalextension and extension managers in the study areas and agricultural extension workers at different levels. The study also relied on data collected from agricultural ; leaders through Zim and held focus groups for some leaders who have a total numberof 28 local agricultural leader.
The results of the questionnaire were presented to the two groups of agriculturalresearchers and agricultural extension workers using the chronological presentation,frequencies and percentages. The KAI test was applied to identify the differences between these two groups in their responses to the questions related to extension and privatization. Social.
As for the leaders of the farmers, their responses to the items covered by the questionnaire were summarized with the first and second groups and presented to determine the degree of agreement or disagreement of these leaders with these two groups in their responses on these matters related to extension and privatization. The main findings can be summarized as follows:
First: Regarding the opinion of the respondents regarding the quality of the extension services and the possibility of privatizing them:
The results indicate that 40% of the agricultural researchers acknowledge the existence of the extension service, compared to 75% of the supervising officials, while the percentage of those who admit that the extension service is not present at the present time 60% of the researchers compared to 2.5% of the supervisors , And most farmers’leaders in the focus groups agreed with them.
2. The results indicate that 32% of the agricultural researchers recognize the quality of the extension service currently, compared to 33% of the supervising officials, while the percentage of those who acknowledge that the extension service is currently not good 68% of the researchers compared to 67% of the guidance officials, Most farmers’ leaders in the focus groups agreed that the quality of the extension services is currently poor.
3. The results showed that 71.4% of the researchers indicated that the farmers agreed to load the expenses for the service, compared to 56.3% of the supervisors. The percentage of those who admit that the farmers did not pay for the service 28.6% compared with 43.7% Workers, and farmers’ leaders in the focus groups on the ability of farmers to pay for the provision of access to a good guidance service.
4. The results indicated that 60.7% of the researchers agree that the farmer will prefer the government sector compared to 62.5% of the supervising officials, while the percentage of those who said that the farmer will prefer the private sector 39.3% of the researchers compared to 37.5% And the farmers’ leaders in-the focus groups. The farmer will deal with the best provider of extension services. The results indicated that 46.4% of the respondents agreed that the farmers will receive paid extension service on their own, compared with 75% of the workers. The percentage of those who said that the farmer would prefer private associations and organizations 53.6% Compared to 25% of the workers. Most of the farmers’ leaders in the focus groups agreed that the farmers prefer to get the service through the agricultural associations and organizations.