![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract The aim of this research is to conduct a contrastive study about verb and noun number in Cairene Colloquial Arabic and Spoken British English in both form and meaning in order to prove that a thorough understanding of a given language requires a complete understanding of its form and function. That is to say, we need to understand not only the formal structures of utterances, i.e. their linguistic form, but also the relation of these utterances to the situations in which they are used, i.e. their meaning. This is due to the fact that: The emphasis is now on the description of language activity as part of the whole complex of events which together with the participants and relevant objects make up actual situations. (Ezzat 20-1) So the tendency now is to study language in all its aspects, not to concentrate on one aspect and to neglect the others as earlier linguists have done. For instance, Traditional grammarians have concentrated on meaning in differentiating between the different parts of speech but they neglect the form of such parts, although it is through the form of words and sentences that we communicate the meanings we like to convey. Structuralists, on the other hand, have concentrated on form and neglected the aspect of meaning as they have 2 depended on the form of words i.e. their inflections and on word order to differentiate between the different parts of speech. Halliday, however, preferred to study language in terms of its form and function to reach the theoretical basis for generalization about the us s of language. The primary function of language in Halliday’s approach is communication as he considers language an instrument of social interaction. Within this functional domain of language I attempted in my thesis to study both the form and function of verb and noun number in Spoken British English and Cairene Colloqulal Arabic with a view to clarifying the differences and similarities between both dialects in this respect. |