![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract T1DM or more accurately type 1A diabetes is thought to arise from selective immunologically mediated destruction of the insulinproducing β-cell in the pancreatic islets of Langerhans with consequent insulin deficiency, this occurs in individuals in whom genetic susceptibility outweighs genetic protection and is probably initiated by environmental factors not yet clearly defined, the disease arises via a cellular-mediated immune process most probably by a specific reaction to one or more β-cell proteins (Autoantigens). The incidence of T1DM The incidence of T1DM in children has been increasing by 3% to 5% per year worldwide since the 1960s, the environmental factors responsible for this epidemic remain unknown, the number of people living with diabetes is now put at 382 million up from 366 million at 2011 expected to rise to 592 million by 2035. The geographical incidence of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) varies widely worldwide, both genetic and environmental factors have been implicated. There are no reported studies on the epidemiology of childhood T1DM in Egypt. the incidence, prevalence and demographic characteristics of T1DM in children (0-18 years) in the Nile Delta region, Egypt. between(1994-2011). (55.7%) were females and (58.4%) were from rural areas. Patients presented most frequently in the(5-10y) and in winter months, concluding that, T1DM incidence and prevalence were found to show an increase over the past 18 years (1994-2011). and were higher in females and more cases from rural areas. SUMMARY 2015 28 Complications of T1DM: Hypoglycemia is the most common complication of T1DM in childhood. It can occur in any child in whom the dose of administered insulin exceeds insulin requirement. Severe and recurrent hypoglycemia can lead to acute and permanent neurologic complications. Microvascular complications T1DM: Diabetic nephropathy occurs in 20–40% of patients with diabetes and is the single leading cause of end stage renal disease, persistent albuminuria in the range of 30–299 mg/ 24 h has been shown to be an early stage of diabetic nephropathy in T1DM. Diabetic Retinopathy(DR), micro aneurysms count predicts long-term incidence of proliferative DR and diabetic macular edema (DME). This demonstrates that early DR is a warning sign of late retinopathy complications. Diabetic Neuropathy(DN) is the most common complication of diabetes mellitus affecting as many as 50% of patients with T1DM, DN involves the presence of symptoms or signs of peripheral nerve dysfunction in people with diabetes after other possible causes have been excluded. Macro Vascular Complications: The macrovascular complication are responsible for approximately 80 % of mortality of diabetes patients, although patients with diabetes commonly experience and complain of microvascular complication ,the greatest cause of death in people with diabetes is cardiovascular disease. Prediction of T1DM: Diabetes progresses from genetic risk to immune activation to β-cell injury to impaired insulin secretion to glucose intolerance and finally to frank disease. Although practitioners are most familiar in the clinical setting with the latter stages of the disease pathogenesis, identifying individuals at risk for T1DM before substantial islet injury is our best chance for diabetes prevention There is a need for diagnostic biomarkers to detect more accurately individuals with pre-diabetes to accelerate targeting for prevention and intervention strategies. The researches generated five major categories of markers that are either currently used or forthcoming: genetic, autoantibody, risk score quantification, cellular immunity and β-cell function. The current standard used focuses on autoimmune pathology and disease-associated auto antibodies. Prevention of T1DM Prevention of T1DM would require interventions aimed to (1) Avoiding exposure to environmental triggers early in life(primary prevention); as TRIGR study, the primary and final endpoint of TRIGR, meaning clinical diabetes by the age of 10 years, will be reached early in 2017. If the intervention works and significantly reduces the cumulative incidence of T1DM by the age of 10 years, this would imply that infants at increased risk of T1DM should be weaned to a highly hydrolyzed formula. If the intervention has no effect, the study recommendation would state that weaning to a highly hydrolyzed formula does not decrease the risk of T1DM. Another study was BABYDIET study which aiming to determine whether delaying the introduction of gluten in infants with a genetic risk of islet autoimmunity may reduce the risk of T1DM associate islet autoimmunity, this study had no effect on appearance of islet antibodies with about 12% of children in both groups developing antibodies over three years. (2) Interfering with the autoimmune cascade that occurs during β- cell destruction (secondary prevention or intervention). Two studies were reported using acute immunosuppressive treatments with humanized antibodies against a T-cell antigen(CD3) for recently diagnosed T1DM patients, the first study showed that patients who were treated with the antibody had better β-cell function and lower exogenous insulin requirements after 1 year than patients in the placebo group, a subsequent study on a larger sample of patients showed that the effects on β-cell function and insulin requirements could be maintained for up to 18 months however very few patients became insulin-free in these trials . (3) Halting or reversing β-cell loss after clinical presentation of T1DM(tertiary intervention) with the aim of easing day-to-day management of diabetes and diminishing complications. Early trials that used broad-spectrum immunosuppressive drugs (Cyclosporine, Azathioprine, Anti-Thymocytic Globulin) have shown some benefits in patients with recent onset of T1DM but the short- and long-term side effects limited their use. Once T1DM has developed, immune interventions are unlikely to be effective because the vast majority of β-cell have been destroyed, at this stage effective interventions would include β-cell implantation, gene therapy or of stem-cell–derived β-cell. Islet cell transplantation enjoyed a period of success. Genetic engineering and stem cell biology hold out the most hope in the long run for a cure for T1DM and elimination of the need to inject insulin. |