![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract The aim of this study to compare the continuous versus interrupted sutures as regard the time taken in the repair, perineal pain (at 48 h, 10 days and three months) postpartum, the need for analgesia up to 48 hours after delivery, amount of blood loss during the repair measured by counting surgical gauze used, drapes around the patient, and amount of blood in the suction container if present, length of threads used by centimeters, wound dehiscence and infection and the need for suture removal and the need for resuturing. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial in healthy, low-risk laboring women requiring surgical repair for episiotomies. In the second stage of labor, 170 pregnant women received a mediolateral episiotomy in Ain Shams University, Maternity Hospital were chosen to participate in the study after obtaining a written consent. They were randomly allocated into two groups A and B; randomization was done using closed enveloped method. Group A: was repaired by interrupted suturing technique and include (85) pregnant women. Group B: was repaired by continuous suturing technique and include (85) pregnant women. The exclusion criteria include: Instrumental vaginal delivery. Previous perineal surgery. Preexisting medical condition that might adversely affect healing, as Diabetes Mellitus. Induction of labor. Complicated episiotomy. Perineal laceration involving anal sphincter (third or fourth). Primipara refuses to be enrolled in the study. The choice of the suture technique was concealed from the patient, resident physicians who managed the delivery and physicians who followed up the patients and evaluated them in the return visit. All the participants were subjected to: Full history for each patient, general, abdominal and vaginal examination. Routine laboratory investigations (CBC, urine analysis, etc.) Abdominal ultrasound. Management of second stage of labor The second stage of labor was managed without instrumentation except for episiotomy which was done when indicated. The standard analgesia for perineal repair was infiltration analgesia in the wound area using five: twenty ml lignocaine ten mg/ml. Episiotomy when indicated was done mediolateral at the time of head crowning. During delivery of the head, modified Ritgen’s maneuver technique was used including: guarding the perineum, slow delivery of the head, maintaining head flexion. Delivery of the shoulders, the anterior shoulder first then the posterior one, by lateral flexion of the body. After delivery, packing of the vagina was done using gauze soaked with betadine after exploration of the vagina. Repair of episiotomy: It was done according to the type of the group: Group A was closed using the interrupted suture (IT) which involves placing three layers of sutures: a continuous ”locking” stitch to close the vaginal epithelium, commencing above the apex of the wound and finishing at the level of the fourchette; three or four interrupted sutures to reapproximate the deep and superficial muscles; and interrupted transcutaneous technique to close the skin. Group B was closed using the continuous knotless suturing technique (CKT) which involves placing the first stitch above the apex of vaginal trauma to secure any bleeding points that might not be visible. Vaginal trauma, perineal muscles (deep and superficial), and skin are reapproximated with a loose, continuous, non- locking technique. The skin sutures are placed closely fairly deeply in the subcutaneous tissue, reversing back and finishing with a terminal knot placed in the vagina beyond the hymeneal reminants. For each participant: The time needed for suturing was recorded, length of threads used by centimeters needed for repair and amount of blood loss during the repair measured by counting surgical gauze used, drapes around the patient and amount of blood in the suction container if present.At 48 hours, ten days and three months after delivery, each patient was Followed up for perineal pain measured by visual analogue scale (V A S), The need for analgesia up to 48 hours after delivery, wound dehiscence and infection, The need for suture removal. Regarding the Maternal outcomes: There was no statistically significant difference could be detected between continuous and interrupted groups as regard participant’s age, weight, BMI, wound dehiscence, infection, wound resuturing, suture removal, and pain after ten days and three months after delivery. The results showed that there was highly statistically significant difference could be detected between continuous and interrupted groups as regard time of wound suturing that the interrupted group had more time of wound suturing compared to the continuous group. The results showed that there was highly statistically significant difference could be detected between continuous and interrupted groups as regard perineal pain at 48 hours and at ten days measured by VAS scales that continuous group had a lower VAS scores compared to interrupted group, but there is no significant difference after three months. The results showed that there was highly statistically significant difference could be detected between continuous and interrupted groups as regard length of threads used by centimeters that it was higher in interrupted group compared to continuous group. The results showed that there was highly statistically significant difference could be detected between continuous and interrupted groups as regard the need for analgesia up to 48 hours after delivery that a larger numbers of the interrupted group needed analgesia compared to continuous group. The results showed that there was highly statistically significant difference could be detected between continuous and interrupted groups as regard the amount of blood loss during the repair measured by counting surgical gauze used and drapes around the patient that it was higher in interrupted group compared to continuous group. |