الفهرس 
المقدمه
ثلاثه اتجاهات فى النظر الى التعدديه الدينيهيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
المستخلص
The monopoly of a particular religion to talk about him like a top extreme religious, Went to the philosophers of religion and theologians; is no longer acceptable in a world in which humanity has widened links and realized through these that other, and They realized through that other religions also have merit in talking about that fact. So, was the subject of religious pluralism trading as such as problematic concerning the philosophy of religion. where she appeared problematic about the importance of christianity as the only way for the salvation of humanity, in the words of theologians. However, there are dimensions of this subject can be identified to, Especially in light of what posed Royce’s philosophy of ideas. Noted that the entrance to the stand on the nature of religious pluralism of Royce is the same as the entrance to the ideal philosophy’s. This is what the study sought to clarify, And stand on what the resulting philosophical concept (ideally) from those of religious pluralism.
The Second: Methodology:
Researcher in this study is based on two Methods: historical method, comparative method.
The historical method: where the historical method used to refer to historical facts that led to the phenomenon of religious pluralism, The sense of examining and analyzing findings Josiah Royce on the basis of the targets set in the philosophy of religious pluralism.
the comparative method: where is the approach best suited the most suitable for the nature of the subject and objectives; Compared to realize their individual and collective differences between the direction of another, and the idea of the other, and are feeling the true dimensions behind it and getting a grip of knowledge on the different directions suits and tract and its implications.
The Third: Department of Study:
Exited the study of ”Religious Pluralism according to Josiah Royce” in the introduction and five chapters.
The first chapter titled ”problematic religious pluralism” and displays this problem as a theme Ask the philosophical discussion table, and what resulted from trends to consider it. While the second chapter of ”absolute religious truth” came discusses the ideal Royce and how to deal with the subject of religious truth (or all destruction). The third chapter, ”religious truth and philosophy of error” to introduce the fact that the angle of knowledge, and that by talking about the wrong philosophy.
The fourth chapter ”religious truth and individual problem” for those discussing religious truth or all but the moral angle, so talking about the will of the people and their actions. The fifth and final chapter ”religious truth and philosophy of loyalty” that outlines the religious truth, but from a social standpoint, so it displays the concept of loyalty when Royce as well as the concept of interpretation.
Came at the end of the study, ”Conclusion” displays the most important results that have been reached, and a list of references used in the study
The Forth: Result of Study:
– Josiah Royce interested in the philosophy of religion, Not as an area of philosophy has its issues and has only patrons, but as a side representing the crossing for his philosophy, his ideal direction.
– Royce differed from the German idealists, where he began his philosophy of religious thought and discussion. While talking about the religion of these philosophers came as the inevitable conclusion to format, and included other subjects such as art and politics.
– Royce dealt with religion in actual reality, christianity had discussed the problem, and what they offer in fact a form of religion to meet human demand for deliverance from evil, and get excited.
– Summed up the problem of religious pluralism in the privacy of a particular religion to talk about extreme truth and relevance of humanity and the world on the one hand, and in recognition of the eligibility of other religions to talk about on the other hand.
– Shows that there are three trends or theories are as problematic for religious pluralism solutions:
A- The first trend is called a name exclusive religious terms to say that christianity is a religion crossing alone for maximum truth, which is the salvation of the human sins in it.
B- The second trend is called the universal (inclusive) and religious trend differs from its predecessor in that, although the view of christianity have his privacy and eligibility in the expression of that fact, but he did not lose sight of the importance of other religions did not give it to talk about scale.
C- The third trend differs from them in that it starts from that extreme truth then subsume any religion and any culture, and so as a means to express them; therefore called this trend the name of ”religious Abundance”, a trend evident in it without the other philosophical touches ill to talk about Indeed, pluralism, and they relate to human beings and the world.
– Show that the problem of ” Religious Pluralism according to Josiah Royce,” is how Royce deal with the issue of christianity privacy and the issue of the existence of other religions and other cultures beside christianity, and checks given to the ideal philosophy as it was necessary, from the beginning, not lose sight of that Royce was influenced by the German philosopher ideal idealists, especially Hegel, where he focused in particular on the handling of the absolute first, such as the principle of coordinated philosophical, religious and secondly as a fact of any such god.
– Royce believes that there is a unit that combines the absolute (philosophical principle) and the world, particles Layout philosophical It is not a unit banking fade with the differences, but the unit to
accommodate the differences in the inside so you do not find the differences between these molecules only within the absolute, whatever the differences, they are legitimate and honest has long been absorbed into the absolute.
– The ideal of moral character when Royce, gaining also has a religious dimension, if to look at these differences as reflect the sins should be on individuals to get rid of them, in order to verify their safety and happiness, are shows that for ”Royce” vision regarding the nature of the relationship between absolute or religious truth, and the differences and diversity of individuals and the result of the sins.
– Royce presents the problem of religious pluralism (not from abroad, also offered her the heck) inside a review of the nature of the relationship between absolute or religious truth, individuals, and how that relationship which is based on the recognition of differences of individuals and their differences and tendencies also based on the desire of these individuals themselves in achieving unity among themselves, And reach their goals and aspirations to the purest and most complete picture of their connection with the absolute or religious truth, sometimes (a) the fact, that at other times (b) will, finally (c) the Savior.
– Show that the ideal solution to the problem of religious pluralism, earned a deeper dimension, so that it does not shows it merely as a discussion so that it can keep the thought of a particular religion, or exclusion, or strengthen the religious thought and upholding would. It shows it as an expression of the nature of the link between human and God
– Rich diversity of philosophy emerged offering of the issue, and it is seeking to provide solutions to them in an orderly and gradual framework. Royce discussed in the beginning of knowledge angle, and then discussed the moral angle, and then discussed by the community angle
– Royce discussed the fact individuals linked to the maximum angle of knowledge, these individuals seek the truth, but they do not find them easily
Show that Royce discussed the relevance of those individuals the maximum truth of moral angle, where the discussion about individual wills, and how the dispute is the other, do not find a way to achieve unity only through access to the human person as an individual in the image of the supervisory
– Royce discussed the fact the maximum link individuals from a social perspective as well. By standing on their loyalty, and how that loyalty is a fundamental value for the community. In this regard, Royce goes to the defense of loyalty is a prerequisite and a project to ensure the survival of society
– The most important is what we came up with, Royce had addressed the problem of religious pluralism with external virtual character from the inside, through the perfect idea about the nature of the philosophical principle or absolute first, and then through the link between them and the world and the human Second.