الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Victorian as well as Edwardian periods passed through certain political, economic, social, scientific and intellectual changes. In the field of agriculture, a great crisis took place in England. Despite the fact that English agriculture was scientific and financially sustained, it could not confront the cheap and simple means of American fanning. As an outcome, English agriculture was destined to downfall and declination, and Industrial Revolution, in turn, gradually replaced agriculture. As a matter of fact, Industrial Revolution had a wide and a noticeable impact on society as a whole; in the first place, it changed the economic and social structure in England, and divided it into two classes or sections: one owned power, money and possession, whereas the other was materially deprived of all such privileges and was even left to live in an utter destitution. The conflict between the two sections of society was inescapable, the matter that was quite obvious in Galsworthy’s The Silver Box (1906), Strife (1909) and The Eldest Son (1912). Moreover, the increase of population, the birth of capitalism, and the emigration from rural areas to new colonies or to cities, had a great impact on society as a whole. Galsworthy’s The Silver Box examines the first type of emigration; namely, the rural emigration to the new colonies. Britain had moved into a new phase of industrialisation. In other words, Britain had gone through a phase of technological and scientific development that had profoundly affected the general ideology and the pattern of education. Industrial Revolution played a great part in the transformation in spinning and weaving that took place at that time. However, such a technological progress had its bad and dangerous effect on the poor, especially on the working classes who were financially dependent on hand-weaving. Consequently, the poor labourers were either deprived of this support or were obliged to move into manufacturing towns and work in the factories for wages. The proletariat engagement in manufacturing was clearly demonstrated in Strife. Although Britain was prosperous due to its growing wealth and scientific inventions, the working classes were getting poorer than before by the Industrial Revolution. Indeed, the wealth of England increased because of the industrialists’ adoption of Adam Smith’s principles of Laisser-faire. The value of anything was measured by its utility or usefulness, which they took as a way of life. Hence, materialism was the prominent feature of that period. John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham were the very exponents of the theory of ’utilitarianism’. However, the state and the condition of the labourers did not improve. One of the drawbacks of the theory of Laisser-faire was that the poor were forced to work in the new factories or else they would starve, particularly after the loss of their land in the enclosure movement. What made things worse was that there were no Factory Acts guaranteeing the safety and health of the workers. They worked too long hours without sufficient wages. The workers also had no political rights like the right to vote, and they had no Trade Unions as well. As a result, many opposing voices came into existence; Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881) and Matthew Arnold (1822-1888) were some of the prophets who appeared in England to oppose the prevailing philosophy. In addition, a group of socialists emerged who claimed that land and capital should be managed and owned by the state not by individuals. Robert Owen, Ruskin and Morris were the main founders of British socialism who believed that England could be reformed by peaceful means; namely, by Trade Unions. |