![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract - 162 • SUMMARY This study was carried out at El-Serw Experimental Station belonging to the Animal Production Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Ministry of Agriculture, to evaluate the carcass of Rahmani lambs under four feeding regimes. Lambs of the l~, 2nd and 4th feeding regimes were fattened for 8 weeks when they reached 16, 24 and )2 wee~s of age, respectively, while those of the 3~ feeding regime were fattened for only 4 weeks started at 32 weeks of age. Slaughter was performed at the end of the fattening periods. All experimental lambs were fed on a growth ration from weaning at 8 weeks of age up to the start of fattening; Experimental lambs were assigned at random from those born as singles during June and July, 1983. The least squares procedures were followed tor the statistical analysis. Results obtained could be summarized as follows: Body Weight and Weight Gain: 1. Body weight ot all the experimental lambs averaged 12.94 ~ 0.36 kg .~ weaning at 8 weeks of age and 19.88 ± 0.53 kg at 16 weeks ot age. Daily gain trom 8 to 16 weeks at age for all experimental lambs averaged 0.124 -+ 0.005 kg. 2. Average body weight was 29.78 kg tor lambs ot the 1.!1 feeding regime at 24 week. ot age, 39.12 kg tor those of the 2nd feeding at )2 weeks ot age, 47.67 kg for those of the 3rd feeding regime at 36 weeks ot age and 54.17 kg tor those - 163 - of the 4!h feeding regime at 40 weeks of age. Weaning weight was always a highly significant (P~ 0.01)source of variation in 24-, 32-, 36-, and 40-week weight. It showed positive dependent relationship with these weights. 3. The mean of average daily gain was 0.165 kg in lambs of the first feeding regime (from 16 to 24 weeks), 0.203 kg in lambs of the 2~ feeding regime (from 24 to 32 weeks), 0.235 kg in lambs of the 3!£ feeding regime (from 32 to 36 weeks) and 0.229 kg in lambs of the 4ih feeding regime (from 32 to 40 weeks of age). 4. Differences between the fattened lambs and their controls in body weight at 24 weeks of age were not significant. Differences in gain from 16 to 24 and from 24 to 32 weeks of age between the same experimental groups followed the same pattern. Feed Conversion: 5.. Feed conversion values ’tor early fattened lambs (from 16 to 24 weeks of age) were 2.869 kg S.E. aa4·O.565 D.P.!kg”gain. The corresponding values were 3.096 kg S.E. and 0.6OB kg D.P./ kg gain for intermediate fattened lambs (from 24 to 32 weeks of age), 3.•042 kg S.E. and 0.591 kg D.P./ kg gain for short late fattened lambs (from )2 to 36 weeks ot age) and 3.449 kg S.E. and 0.672 kg D.P.!kg gain ’tor long late fattened lambs (from 32 to 40 weeks of age). - 164 - Carcass evaluation: 6. Average slaughter (fasted) weight was )l.JJ kg for lambs of the l~ feeding regime (fattened from 16 to 24 weeks), 43.75 kg for lambs of the 2nd feeding regime (fattened from 24 to 32 weeks), 50.50kg for lambs of the 3rd feeding regime (fattened from 32 to )6 weeks) - and 5:9.25 kg for lambs of the 4!!! feeding regime (fattened from 32 to 40 weeks). 7. Means of live condition score for the same experimental groups in the same order were 2.66, 4.08, 4.50 and 4.00. The corresponding averages were 2.84, 4.17, 4.50 and 5.60 for carcass oQDtarma~aa aoare.Effects of teeding regime on both live condition score and carcass conformation score were statistically highly significant (P 4!.0. 01) • t ~ Hot carcass weight averaged 14.46, 20.64, 24.64 and 28.54 kg tor lambs of the l~, 2B!, 3~ and 4!a teeding regime, respectively. Dressing percent for lambs of the 4 feeding regime in the same order was estimated as 46.10, 47.10, 48.80 and 48.10 ~ when estimated relative to the slaughter weight and as 53.30, 51.BO, 54.50 and 57.20 ~ when estimated relative to the empty ~od1 weight. Differences due to feeding regime etfects were proved to be highly significant (P L. 0.01) tor hot carcass weight and only significant (P~ 0.05) for dressing percent 8Ta1uated relatiTe to empty bod,. weight. - 165 - 9. Prime cuts on the average amounted to 68.10, 61.10, 64.00 and 62.90 % of the hot carcass when estimated for lambs of the 1l!1, 2B2-.,3~ and 4!1! feeding regime, the differences were highly significant (P L 0.01). 10. The proportion of lean content in the 9 - 10 - 11 rib cut averaged 64.0, 59.8, 58.6 and 60.2 % of lambs of the 1!1, 2nd, J~ and 41B feeding regime, respectively. The corresponding estimates were 17.5, 20.40, 24.70 and 25.60 % for fat content and 18.10, 19.40, 16.40 and 14.0~ for bone %. Differences in these traits due to feeding regime did not attain significances except for bone content (P L 0.01). 11. ~. dorsi index and area differed with feeding regime, the differences were not significant tor the index but proved so for the area. Fat thickness on~. dorsi and on rib varied with feeding regime but without significant difterenees. 12. Carcass evaluation was the best for lambs ot the 3rd feeding regime. |