![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract 10797886 », SUMi>4,ARY AND CONClUSIONS STUD:I;ES OF :N.A.P:tERG~SS H_ASA GREEN FODDER FOR CALF FATTENING The study waS carried out to c~mpare fattening ot calves on Napier (elephsnt) grass as a ~ole green fodder and Napier gras with moderate allowance of concentrate mixture with the conventional fattening ration (Concentrate + rice straw). Thirtynale calves were assigned at rFindom 8l’ld grouped three homogenous groupS of teD calves eacho During the first fattening period (18 weeks), the three groups of oalves received their experimental retions(A) Napier graBS alone, (B) Napier grass pl~3 concentrate mixture, and (C) rice straw plus concentrate mixture. In the sUbsequent to 10 weeks (the second period), calves in all groups received a finishing ration consisting of rice straw and concentrate mixture. Live body weight changes were recorded biweekly throughout the 196 daY whole experimental period.Adigeetibility trial waS conducted to deter~ine the digestibility of the three ration (A) , (B) and (C) outlined above • Average live body weights of calves at the beginning of the experiment were 177.5, 177.4 and 176.9 kg for the three gro~pa. respectively. At the first exper1~ental period, average daily Dl oonsumption we.!! 4.97., 4.04 and 5.62 kg for the three experi-nental rstiona, respectively. Feed conversion val~se experessed RS kilograms SE/kg wei~ht gain were 5.828, ).582 and 5.508 kg. production --_.- - - ----_.------------------ _ ..•.-•..-...-.----..•.....--._------ (78) efficiency values were 0.172,0.279 and 0.181 kg weight gain/kg S.E. Average daily weight gains were 0.517, 0.666 and 0.525 kg for calves ted rations A, B and C, respectively. The differences in daily weight gains were statistically sighificant (P~O.05). At the second experimental period (finishing period) average aaily DM consumption was 8.12, 8.44 and 8.13 kg for rations At Band C,reepectively. Feed conversion values expressed as kilograms SE/kg weight gain were 4.919, 5.802, and 4.674 kg. production efficiency values were 0.203, 0.172 and 0.214 kg weight gain/kg SE and average daily weight gains were 0.850 0.748 and 0.896 kg tor calves fed ratione: A ,B and C, respectively. Average daily II4 conswuption tor the tot’ll experimental period were 6.09, 5.16 and 6.51 kg/ealffor rations A, B and C,respectively • Feed convereion values expressed as kilograms SE/kg weight gain were 5.393, 4.435 and 5.102 kg. production efficiency values were 0.185 0.225 and 0.196 kg weight gain/ kg SE, Average daily weight gains were 0.636, 0.697 and 0.659 kg for calves fed rations A. B and C, respectively. ~conomica1 efficiency values expre8sed as the ratio between price ot weight gain and cost of ?eed c on sumed • The vall.1es were 4.46 , 4.67 - --’-- -- -’--- ---~~--~-~-- (79) and 3.86 for calves ted rations A,B and C, respectivel~ Cost of feed consumed to produce one kg weight gain were 24.64. 2).55 and 28.50 P.T for rations A,B and C, reepectivelyo Digestion coefficients ot DK, CP, EE, OF and NFE for Napier grass ( rstion A) were 71.59. 73.66,15.53, 17.15 and 74.13% respectively. The .corresponding values for Napier grass plus concentrate mixture (59=41% on DM basis) were 63.80. 72.73,68.06,62.18 and 71.56%, respectively,and those for concentrate mixture plus rice straw (59:41% o. DM basis) were 68.63, 75.31 56.74, 59.12 and 72.90%, res,ectively. The feeding values of the fresh Napier grass expressed as SE, TDN and DCP were 10.78, 12.44, and 1.69% respectively. When expressed on DM basis, these values were 60.50% SE, 69.80%, TDN and 9.47% DOP. The correspo.ding values for Napier grass plus concentrate mixture ( ration B) on DY basis were 59.l7~ SE, 66.49~ TDN an d 10.76% DOP. The feeding values as a SE, TDN and DCP for concentrate mixture plus rice straw (ration C) on llI4 basis were ~1.96,.63-.60&8’. 76%,respecti vely. ~-_._--------------------------_. (80) Conclusions: Based on the findings of this investigation, it could be concluded that Napier grass is a palatable forage. well digested and has high feeding values when fed to calves either alone or with limited amounts of concentrate mixture. Addition of a moderate allowance of concentrate to Napier grass improve the production efficiency and consequently improve weight gain. Using Napier grass in eWft-nerfor fattening calves hal!!! impl’- oved economical efficiency and effectively decreased the cost of meat production. It could be recommended that swmmer forage crops be utilized in feeding cattle in Bgypt to solve the problem of sumner feeds shortage, find in the meantime to Save considerable amounts of conoentrates. ------- ------ -- -- --- |