الفهرس 
Introduction and Aim of the WorkOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 161 |  |  |
| | | from | 161 | | |
Abstract
Aim of the work
To compare the effectiveness of different treatment modalities: classical treatment, calcitonin or acupuncture on the natural course of migraine.
Conclusion
It is concluded that calcitonin was more effective in short term treatment than in long term treatment. Also, we concluded that both of acupuncture and flunarizine treatment were effective as prophylactic treatment in migraine. However acupuncture was superior to flunarizine and has fewer side effects.
It may be worthwhile recommending the use of calcitonin treatment as an analgesic during the migraine attack and acupuncture and fluranizine treatment as prophylactic treatment in migraine.